Amid swirling discussions and debates surrounding Caitlin Clark’s absence from Team USA’s roster for the upcoming international competitions, USA Basketball’s Selection Committee Chair, Jen Rizzotti, has stepped forward to shed light on the decision-making process.

Rizzotti, in a recent statement, highlighted the meticulous criteria-based approach taken by the committee in selecting the final roster. She explained that while Clark’s talent is undeniable, there were other players who better fit the team’s needs and checked more boxes in terms of criteria.

“When you base your decision on criteria, there were other players that were harder to cut because they checked a lot more boxes,” Rizzotti stated. The decision-making process, she revealed, involved considerations such as position, style of play, and sometimes even a vote among committee members.

Rizzotti emphasized the committee’s responsibility to prioritize the team’s performance and dynamics over external factors such as popularity or viewer engagement. “It would be irresponsible for us to talk about her in a way other than how she would impact the play of the team,” she asserted. “It was our purview to create the best team we could for (coach) Cheryl Reeve.”

The exclusion of Clark from Team USA’s roster has sparked widespread debate among basketball enthusiasts, with many expressing disappointment and questioning the decision. However, Rizzotti’s insights offer a glimpse into the rigorous selection process and the considerations involved in assembling a competitive team for international competitions.

While Clark’s absence may disappoint some fans, Rizzotti’s explanation underscores the committee’s commitment to making decisions based on merit and team dynamics rather than individual talent alone. As the international competitions draw near, all eyes will be on Team USA as they strive to defend their title with the roster carefully curated by the selection committee.