Prince Harry’s Controversial Demand in Security Appeal to High Court Judge

Prince Harry reportedly made a surprising demand to the High Court judge in Britain after his appeal regarding Home Office security was permitted to proceed.

Prince Harry denied permission to 'jump the queue' in security appeal

Background

In February 2020, the Royal and VIP Executive Committee (Ravec) decided to revoke Prince Harry’s automatic right to security, sparking a lengthy legal dispute. After seeking a judicial review, Prince Harry lost the case in September 2021. Although most of his appeal grounds were dismissed, Lord Justice Bean noted that one ground had a real chance of success.

Denial of Priority in Security Appeal

Despite the setback, Prince Harry’s legal team will move forward with the appeal, focusing on the fairness and legality of Ravec’s security decision-making process. Prince Harry remains dedicated to ensuring he receives the same consideration as others under Ravec’s policies.

Request to Expedite the Appeal

Royal author and commentator Angela Levin suggested that Harry’s urgency in appealing is linked to his and Meghan’s upcoming world tour. She speculated that the tour aims to emulate royal family activities, emphasizing the need for security.

Prince Harry requested that the appeal be heard by the end of July, fearing that delays might affect other countries’ approaches to his security. With several overseas tours planned, Harry argued that the prolonged litigation, spanning two-and-a-half years, necessitated a swift resolution as his legal team would be preoccupied with other matters from October onwards.

However, Lord Justice Bean, while allowing the appeal, refused to expedite the proceedings, stating: “It is rightly not suggested that the claimant is entitled to jump the queue because of his status.”

Implications

The Court of Appeal’s decision holds significant consequences for Prince Harry and the broader royal family. The ongoing legal battle raises questions about the balance between security protocols and individual rights. The appeal’s outcome could set a precedent for future cases involving high-profile individuals.

Prince Harry’s security appeal underscores the tension between public safety and personal entitlement. As the legal process continues, all eyes are on the Court of Appeal to see if Prince Harry will have to wait his turn like any other citizen or if his case will be treated with special priority.