Despite some expected (and not altogether unwarranted) dissatisfaction from Caitlin Clark loyalists, the Olympic committee made a reasonable decision omitting her from the 12-person Olympic roster, writes The Athletic’s Ben Pickman.

The committee’s decision to exclude Clark is not a total surprise. It reflects past precedents and prioritizes team chemistry over individual star power. The selection process is based on specific criteria: attitude, adaptability to internal game strategies, and the likelihood of contributing to overall team success. Popularity, while important to fans, is not a factor in these evaluations.

Clark has been a catalyst in elevating the women’s game, earning accolades and admiration. Her impressive performances, both at Iowa and in her early WNBA career, have sparked debate over her exclusion. However, the committee’s focus remained on creating a cohesive and effective team, emphasizing basketball skills and teamwork over public opinion.

This decision aligns with the committee’s framework, ensuring that each player selected fits seamlessly into the team’s dynamics. While Clark’s supporters may be disappointed, it’s crucial to understand that the committee’s objective is to construct the best possible team, not necessarily the most popular one.

Just as Clark focuses on her game rather than external chatter, the committee’s emphasis was on building a squad that maximizes team success. This approach underscores the importance of collective effort and strategic cohesion, which are vital for Olympic competition.

In conclusion, while Clark’s omission has stirred controversy, the Olympic committee’s decision adheres to its established criteria, ensuring that the team is poised for success on the global stage.